﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Epidemiology and Health System Journal</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2980-7891</Issn>
      <Volume>7</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Performance of the Quantitative Latex Immunoturbidimetric D-dimer Assay for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism at Rafik Hariri University Hospital</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>125</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>128</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.34172/ijer.2020.22</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Rida</FirstName>
        <LastName>Salman</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-3925</Identifier>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mira</FirstName>
        <LastName>Alsheikh</LastName>
        <Identifier Source="ORCID">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6848-1678</Identifier>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Rim</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ismail</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>REVIEW</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.34172/ijer.2020.22</ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>13</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2020</Year>
        <Month>08</Month>
        <Day>09</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background and aims: The diagnostic workup for pulmonary embolism (PE) includes D-dimer assay and computed tomographic angiography. Several D-dimer assays have been approved for PE diagnosis with different sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to study the sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative latex agglutination D-dimer assay used in a referral teaching hospital in Lebanon for the diagnosis of acute PE. Methods: Using a retrospective chart review, we studied 300 patients who had D-dimer test at Rafik Hariri University Hospital in the period between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013. Accordingly, 93 patients had a CT angiography after being suspected to have acute PE. A statistical table 2*2 was used to compare the results of CT angiography and D-dimer test. Results: Thirteen patients (13.97%) had PE and 60 patients (64.51%) had positive D-dimer test. Quantitative latex agglutination D-dimer assay had a sensitivity of 69%, specificity of 36%, and negative predictive value of 88%. False positive ratio was also 64%. Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained with an area under the curve measuring 0.527. Conclusion: Quantitative latex agglutination D-dimer assay has a high negative predictive value; thus, it can exclude a PE diagnosis if it is associated with low clinical pretest probability. </Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Pulmonary embolism</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">D-dimer</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Latex agglutination</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Lebanon</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>